The Saving Grace - Economic Review, Third Quarter 1994 - Dallas Fed

نویسندگان

  • Richard Alm
  • David M. Gould
چکیده

A nation’s savings matters. Money set aside from today’s consumption can be invested, through financial markets, in productive assets embodying the latest innovations. A newer and better capital stock can provide the fuel to sustain higher rates of growth and improve living standards. In a nutshell, that’s the current view of many economists, one that places savings among the most important pillars of a nation’s long-term economic health. Michael Mussa, economic counselor and director of research at the International Monetary Fund, summed it up: “Why is saving important? Primarily because investment is important....Growth tends to be high in economies where savings and investments are both high and reasonably well deployed, and growth tends to be poor in economies in which savings and investments are low or not well deployed.” The past decade has brought a greater appreciation of the beneficial role of savings in an economy. Before that, many economists, using Robert Solow’s 1956 work, argued that saving didn’t contribute all that much to growth. Additional saving might increase the capital stock and raise living standards, but it didn’t boost long-run growth prospects. In the 1980s, endogenous growth theorists began to see that additional capital, both physical and human, gave society a growth bonus, usually related to more rapid technological progress. Now, most economists recognize saving as an important factor in growth as well as standards of living. This shift in the profession’s views on saving’s role in economic growth puts a spotlight on a number of related issues. They include:

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Welfare and the Locational Choices of New Immigrants - Economic Review, Second Quarter, 1997 - Dallas Fed

of the United States (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office). U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (various years), Survey of Current Business (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Commerce). U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (various years), Employment and Earnings (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department

متن کامل

Saving, Investment, and Growth: A Causality Test

In the second half of the last century, tremendous efforts were devoted to identifying sources of economic success by a few countries and causes of failure by most. In this process a voluminous literature ranging from the neo-classical to Marxist, neo-Marxist, and dependency theories has been developed to answer the question of disparity among different countries of the north vis-à-vis those of...

متن کامل

Externalities, Markets, and Government Policy - Economic Review, Third Quarter 1996 - Dallas Fed

structure of the problem at hand. In 1991, Ronald H. Coase received the Nobel prize for his work on the role of transaction costs in economics. His paper on “The Nature of the Firm” (Coase 1937) introduced transaction costs as the primary reason for the existence of firms. Coase pointed out that firms substitute an internal management structure for market transactions to eliminate the costs of ...

متن کامل

When Will the United States Grow Out of Its Foreign Debt?- Economic Review, Third Quarter 1992 - FRB Dallas

One of the most provocative developments in the u.s. economy during the 191)0s was the rapid increase in net foreign claims on U.S. assets, \vith its counterpart in a large domestic trade deficit. To som(:" observers. the heightened pace of foreign acquisition of u.s. assets was clear evidence of an improved investment climate and so should be regarded as a sign of strength To others, however, ...

متن کامل

Trade Deficits: Causes and Consequences - Economic Review Fourth Quarter 1996 - Dallas Fed

economic growth than the other. On September 19, 1996, the Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, and New York Times reported trade figures released by the U.S. Department of Commerce showing that the monthly U.S. trade deficit increased by $3.5 billion in July 1996. Almost unanimously, analysts quoted in the articles stated that the recent trade figures showed weakness in the U.S. economy. The ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2004